Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537138 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy <loupgaroublond@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-12 16:23:53 EDT --- Alot of packages are not, i spent half the day methodically rebuilding a bunch of packages that were missing or needed newer versions. I haven't figured out if all of them are epel, though i think some of them, including libxml2 are core packages and it might not be possible to update them without difficulty. At $dayjob we've decided to stop using cpan to install modules and to focus our efforts on building RPMs where possible. As long as i can do it within the infrastructure of Fedora/EPEL, this will be ok, and i am more than willing to take up any branches that we need to support EPEL so long i'm working at this job. Presumably if i leave, this duty will be picked up by my successor. Comaintanership is always welcome. I'll have a look at the CVS packages tommorow then. All i did was update the Version field anyways, and i'm not 100% sure the package is going to work until after i run it on our test systems and ask the researchers to break it thoroughly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
