Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537138 --- Comment #4 from Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-12 16:02:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sure, if you do it in devel, i'm just going to backport it for our environment > anyways. Once we have this working, we can always use any patches i figure out > to deploy the same to el5 if you're interested. Thanks! PS. I'm really glad somebody is interested in getting this ported to EPEL as others have been asking me whether they could get bioperl packaged on RHEL/EPEL/Centos, but I don't have the time, nor do I run any RHEL/Centos machines. Will this mean you will submit/maintain the package for EPEL? Also are all the other perl deps (e.g. perl-Graph etc.) now available for EPEL? Creating and maintaining all those extra EPEL branches was another reason I wasn't able to take on the task myself (although I am willing to be a co-maintainer) > I'll give the commenting trick a stab at work tomorrow morning. I tried forcing > the install of the fedora package for perl-bioperl-run but it's got a > dependency on perl 5.10 which doesn't help the situation much. I was debating > doing the same anyways. OK, no patch has been yet committed for devel (which means F-13 as F-12 is now taking updates), although any improvements on my hack in the spec file that you make will be happily filtered back to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
