Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537138 Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|skasal@xxxxxxxxxx |alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Alex Lancaster <alexl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-11-12 15:42:36 EDT --- If you look at the .spec file: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/perl-bioperl/devel/perl- bioperl.spec?revision=1.23&view=markup you'll notice that we have: #cat << \EOF > %{_builddir}/BioPerl-%{version}/%{name}-req ##!/bin/sh #%{__perl_requires} $* |\ # sed -e '/perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Alignment::Clustalw)/d; /perl(Bio::Tools::Run::GenericParameters)/d; /perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Molphy::ProtML)/d; /perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::Neighbor)/d; /perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::ProtDist)/d; /perl(Bio::Tools::Run::Phylo::Phylip::ProtPars)/d; /perl(Bio::Tools::Run::RemoteBlast)/d' #EOF #%%define __perl_requires %{_builddir}/BioPerl-%{version}/%{name}-req #chmod +x %{__perl_requires} to handle the bootstrapping problem. So simply enable those sections of the spec on first build, then build perl-bioperl-run against them, then comment them out again. Not pretty but it works (more requires may need to be filtered since new requires may have been added since the first bootstrap). (In reply to comment #1) > Thanks for the report. > > I think that it makes sense to filter the perl-bioperl requires so that > perl-bioperl-run is not required by them. Right and that's what the above does, although I'm not sure if that's a good idea to permanently filter them. > (Otherwise the two packages could probably be merged.) No that should not be done, because they are two tarballs maintained separately with different release schedules upstream. I have already discussed this problem with upstream and if anything they are moving in the direction of more modularisation of bioperl into separate packages than less. > I'm going to fix this in devel; I doubt it is worth to issue a F11 update for > this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
