Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520505 Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-09-03 13:20:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > [...] a spurious dependency [...] coming from somewhere in t/* in docs. > IMO the best fix here [...] would be to _not_ package test suite code > at all. Sorry, but I cannot agree. The best fix is to skip all %doc files when generating dependencies. There are often some examples in the docs, and it is a mistake to base package requirements on these as well. I hope to manage to get this to rpm during F-13 development. > IMO the best fix here (and something that should be done by default in > practically all perl packages) would be to _not_ package test suite code > at all. There are often good reasons to pack the testsuite as documentation; it is well explained by Chris Weyl in http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2009-August/msg00351.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
