On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:43:11AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 06/04/16 10:09, Petr Pisar wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:14:43PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > >>On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:43:41PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > >>>Might it not be easier to use the newly-allowed boolean dependencies, e.g. > >>>in rpm-build something like this: > >>> > >>>Requires: (perl-generators if perl-libs) > >>> > >>That's interesting idea. I only worry there could be cases when the > >>perl-generators were unnecessarily installed. E.g. you install vim-enhanced, > >>thus you have perl-libs, and you install rpm-build for building non-perl > >>packages. Then you will have perl-generators. I'm not sure how much it > >>would bother people. > >> > >Another issue: FESCo banned the rich dependencies > ><https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1563#comment:7>. > > We were discussing this for F-25 and they're not banned for F-25, just F-24, > at least so far. > They are. <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/BBFUZQP3QWBAFNCN6EQLAPKQGNTTPD35/>. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
