https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282911 --- Comment #8 from Petr Šabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #7) > On the contrary, I'm planning to maintain it in EPEL too. Thanks for the > detailed clarifications, anyway. > > - Added perl(integer) to BR (thought that all concerned Perl versions had it > so omitted it initially); You never know what the future might bring. And even if it's very unlikely, just listing everything is more consistent and, in a way, easier. > - Dropped META.json. Ack. > EL6 doesn't support %license tag so I didn't used it. The Group tag is also > kept for more EPEL adaptivity. Regarding the Group tag: Ack. The %license macro is mandatory in Fedora, though. I use the following `trick' in my packages. There might be a better way but this works fine: %{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc} %license LICENSE %doc Changes README -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
