https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249716 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|rt |rpm Assignee|rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx |packaging-team-maint@redhat | |.com --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ľuboš Kardoš from comment #2) > The problem is that in a previous version of rpm was bug causing that all > files in %{_pkgdocdir} became part of a package despite the fact that they > wasn't explicitly listed in file list (#728959). We fixed that bug and > changed that behaviour intentionally. I understand that this change of > behaviour is unpleasant for you Please understand that I do not agree with you. IMO, you FUBARed rpm's %doc handling. > because it causes FTBS but former behaviour > was broken and we don't plan to revert back to that behaviour. There was nothing wrong with this package. It was installing some files into %_pkgdocdir directly and was adding others using %doc. This was one way, recommended by the former rpm-maintainer - You broke that! > BTW %doc followed by relative paths of files copies these files from BUILD > to BUILDROOT/%{_pkgdocdir}. And you don't need to do that because this is > already done by your install script (by "make install"). You are wrong again. rt's "make install" installs a lot of files into %_pkgdocdir. %doc was used to add some files. > You don't need to use %doc for absolute paths in %{_pkgdocdir} either > because all files in %{_pkgdocdir} are automatically marked as doc files. For now, I resorted to manually install those files, which used to be %doc and to use %files %{_pkgdocdir} Also, let me emphasize that I furthon will not step in to fix FTBS in future mass rebuild because I consider these FTBSes your responsibility, which is why I am expecting you to fix each and every package yourselves. Alos, IMO, your change does not fix anything in rpms. To the contrary. You broke rpm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
