On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Yanko Kaneti <yaneti@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What do you mean ? How DBI::Class::DynamicDefault is independent ofOn Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Tom Callaway wrote:
> > -%{perl_vendorlib}/*
> > +%{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/*
> > %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
> >
> > %changelog
> > +* Fri Jun 26 2009 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 0.03-2
> > +- fix duplicate directory ownership (perl-DBIx-Class owns %{perl_vendorlib}/DBIx/Class/)
>
> Tom, you are not fixing bugs your are breaking things!
>
> perl modules do not share a strict hierarchy, but are independent packages!
DBI::Class ?
http://deps.cpantesters.org/?module=DBIx::Class::DynamicDefault;perl=latest
What Ralf is rather vigorously saying is that both by convention and explicit guideline, due to the fluid nature of perl-* packages they're supposed to own everything they provide under %{perl_vendorarch} or %{perl_vendorlib}. Specifying ownership of a subset of that is considered a blocker at review and a packaging bug post-review... It's just a packging issue, it has nothing to do with the relationship between DBIC and DBIC::DynamicDefault.
-Chris
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
-- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
