On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:08:51 -0800
Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > So:
> >
> > bug 487958 - [rpm] rtld(GNU_HASH) dropped
> > bug 487960 - [rpmdevtools] RFE: filter Perl private libs for
> > arch-specific packages
>
> Well, the spec template addition looks to be a no-go... Apparently
> solving an actual problem is too ugly to be included :-) I suspect
> that doesn't matter too much anyways, as most people seem to use
> either cpanspec or CPANPLUS::Dist::RPM to build out their initial spec
> files.
>
> I also just filed two more:
>
> bug 487972 - [rpm] RFE: filter private Perl lib provides
> bug 487974 - [rpmlint] RFE: error on shlib provides from under
> %perl_*arch
>
> I have very low hopes for 487972; AFAIK no request for rpm to filter
> certain provides from any specific directory has ever been granted.
This version seems to work a little better:
# don't "provide" private Perl libs
%global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
%global __deploop() while read FILE; do /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdeps -%{1} ${FILE}; done | /bin/sort -u
%global __find_provides /bin/sh -c "%{__grep} -v '%{perl_vendorarch}/.*\\.so$' | %{__deploop P}"
%global __find_requires /bin/sh -c "%{__deploop R}"
Paul.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
