Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461350 --- Comment #4 from Steven Pritchard <steve@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-21 20:53:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > THe CPANTS test suite makes use of Module::ExtractUse which seems to do a > pretty good job (at least on the modules I maintain it appears accurate). The > CPANTS results also suggest that on the order of 1/3 of all modules have > missing PreReqs declared in their META.yml/Makefile.PL vs their actual use. So, > IMHO it'd be worth making use of module like this to extract usage. How about just extracting module use from the tests? The current version in CVS ( http://cpanspec.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/cpanspec/cpanspec/cpanspec ) has a simple stab at this idea. Interestingly, see how badly it blows up on Module::ExtractUse's tests. :-) > Perhaps if this detected modules not declared in the META.yml, it could add the > BR to the RPM spec, along with a comment informing the packager that they > should double check this module usage manually. That would take more code, but it would probably be better in the long run... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
