Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461350 Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Steven Pritchard <steve@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-11-25 21:58:46 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #2 from Steven Pritchard <steve@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-01-16 16:33:59 EDT --- Sorry I missed this before... (In reply to comment #0) > cpanspec nearly always misses the BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) for test > suite files. > > I imagine this is because the 'use' statement often has trailing arguments > > use Test::More tests => 19; > > instead of a more usual > > use Test::More; Actually, I wish it were that simple. cpanspec only looks at CPAN metadata. If a dependency isn't in META.yml or Makefile.PL, it won't be picked up. Unfortunately, it seems like hardly anyone bothers to list Test::More as a dependency. The only way to fix this would be to use something like Module::ScanDeps, but I've never been able to decide if that would be the right thing to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
