Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473874 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-01 10:51:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Documentation is for humans to read. If a script is truly just documentation > then packaging it as executable is just as much a defect as packaging man pages > with executable bits set. Documentation containing non-executeable scripts are crippled docs. > But that's well into the land of "spec and packaging > hygiene and policies" department which I've zero interest in arguing over, and > little to do with the actual issue here. Note that the patch does not change > any type definitions, and by making the logic for limit macros match that > for the corresponding type definitions more closely it makes the header > much easier to check by inspection than it presently is. > You have, because rpm is your job and because it's your rpm which * is producing broken results. * forces users to cripple their packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
