Re: DBIx::Class and minimum perl requirements (especially EPEL)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Nigel Metheringham
<nigel.metheringham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Nice to meet you - and commiseration's on being responsible for packaging
> DBIx::Class (having packaged it myself for our internal systems I know it is
> a bitch of module to package with a tendancy to pull in all of CPAN as a
> dep).

Nice to meet you as well -- DBIx::Class was definitely one of those
packages that had a, well, very large dependency tree when I submitted
it for review :)

> Minutes before seeing your message I committed some proposed changes to both
> documentation and test suite to cover these issues.
>
> I would appreciate your comments on svn commits 5009 & 5010 to
> http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/0.08/branches/doc_mods
>
> http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/svnweb/bast/revision?rev=5009
> http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/svnweb/bast/revision?rev=5010
>
> I don't have access to my test RHEL5 VMs from here (home), so have not
> tested the tests on an affected system, but it *should* work - will check it
> tomorrow morning.

The diffs (documentation) looked good to me.  I pulled down
t/99rh_perl_perf_bug.t (r5014) and tried it out on a couple systems.

On a F-9 system (perl-5.10.0-34.fc9), both tests passed cleanly (as expected).

On a F-8 system with the latest perl (perl-5.8.8-41fc8), the first
test failed, but the second test passes.  This makes me worry, as
we're failing a test here on an F-8 system that doesn't actually have
this problem.

Given that these tests look for something that is specifically a
RH/Fedora issue, would it be unreasonable to look for specific
Fedora/RH information in determining the first test pass/fail?
Unfortunately, it looks like prior to F-9, patchlevel.h wasn't upated
with any applied patch info; so we can't use that...  But we could
test for the presence of /etc/{fedora,redhat}-release, and use rpm to
query for the rpm package version.  If any of these bits aren't there
for us to query, no problem, we're not on an impacted system, and we
can pass the first test.

What do you think? :)

                               -Chris
-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux