Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx |pertusus@xxxxxxx --- Comment #19 from Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-14 11:57:24 EDT --- Hello Pat, (In reply to comment #17) > I am indeed ready to do the review; great! Thanks a lot. Marcela (the current asisignee) agrees, so I'm re-assigning the bug to you. > But I really dislike epochs too. yep. > # the version is against the guidelines. However adherence to > # the guideline would imply using an epoch, which is very inconvenient. > # Given that this package is very slowly moving, and hoping that > # upstream skip one version to go straight to 0.47, it seems better > # not to use an epoch. If 0.46 is ever released, the epoch way would have > # to be used, but we are better avoiding that if possible. > > That seems to me to be a better argumentation ;-) Very nice and clear, thanks. What about the following small change, though? s/this package is very slowly moving/this package's development is stalled since Sep 1999/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
