Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #16 from Stepan Kasal <skasal@xxxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-14 08:40:13 EDT --- Hello Patrice, (In reply to comment #13) > About the version, the comment should pasted here so that everybody > can see what reasononing is used. You are right, sorry. > ###### rpmlint error: E: invalid-version 0.46alpha > # We use the version tag "0.46alpha" -- the traditional version number of > # this module since Sep 1999, immutable through the ages, no matter what the > # current Package Naming Guidelines say. > > which is a very poor argumentation in my opinion. How would you solve this? Would you change evr to 1:0.46-0.1.alpha.fc10 ? Does this really justify the epoch increase? Wouldn't that confuse people: "oh, 0.46 finally released!" "Oh, wait, ... Dash!, those RH &*!% always advertise different version then they deliver!" But I agree to change evr that way if you do the review for me. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
