Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |pertusus@xxxxxxx Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> 2008-10-14 07:12:12 EDT --- I am quite confused by the status of this review. Who is the maintainer and who is the reviewer? Also it is not right to close it without letting Parag say something. About the version, the comment should pasted here so that everybody can see what reasononing is used. I found: ###### rpmlint error: E: invalid-version 0.46alpha # We use the version tag "0.46alpha" -- the traditional version number of # this module since Sep 1999, immutable through the ages, no matter what the # current Package Naming Guidelines say. which is a very poor argumentation in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
