Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Inconsistent @INC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448735 ------- Additional Comments From skasal@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-05-29 07:57 EST ------- Well, if I remove the empty directory /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7, then it disappears from @INC. I guess we should not deliberately break old third party modules, so we might keep that as a candidate for the @INC, but should not pack the empty dirs to the rpm. The report also shows another inconsistency: on i386, site_perl is under /usr/lib*, while on x86_64 it is under /usr/local/lib*. Which is right? Since our rpm's should install to vendor_perl, not site_perl, it would seem that /usr/local/lib* is the right place for site_perl. But we have to do something about backward compatibility... Would a symlink suffice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
