[Bug 228043] ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228043


paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-05-07 04:09 EST -------
Whoops, this bug is referring to the timestamp *in* the file rather than the
timestamp *of* the file. In spamassassin-3.2.4-1.fc8 these files are identical
in content between i386 and x86_64 so I'll close the bug again. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux