Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Please do not depend on perl devel packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432176 ------- Additional Comments From wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-12 13:50 EST ------- Upstream has accepted this patch. OK, here are our options: 1) Split the package for this single file. Undesirable for many reasons. I really want to avoid this. We especially don't want to split it in a different way than upstream splits their RPM because that is sure to add to confusion. 2) Leave it as is. How mad will this make our users? 3) Filter the req. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FilteringAutomaticDependencies This requires something like: Source91: filter-requires.sh %define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 %define __find_requires %{SOURCE91} _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 has the drawback of disablin the part that tags elf files as either 32 or 64-bit, so everything gets treated as a conflict. However spamassassin is not a multilib package so this is probably OK? Perhaps we need perl SIG opinions here. If this is OK, then I would prefer option #3, filtering the req. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list
