perl-DBI - split?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

The issue of .h files in a non-devel RPM rears its head again.  In the
package review for perl-DBI, my package reviewer points out rpmlint
warnings about .h files in a non-devel package.  So, the question is, is
it worth it?  Technical rpm correctness, or the blessed silence of
people not yelling about having to change their BR's?  Of course, in
this case it's a much more limited set of packages to change.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226253

-RN

-- 
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.

"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Fedora-perl-devel-list mailing list
Fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-perl-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux