On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:14:45PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le Jeu 23 août 2007 12:58, Patrice Dumas a écrit : > > > Ok, I didn't understood it that way. But it isn't true, the guidelines > > are setup such that having no ownership of a directory is impossible. > > I'm not so sure. The lax guidelines are more ambiguous, at no time do > they clearly say "every directory must be owned" (with single or > multiple owners). They say "the rule of thumb is everything must be Indeed. It would be much more clearer if there was, in addition to all the explanations, a simple sentence saying, maybe as a conclusion of all the examples: "In any case there should never be any unowned directory appearing after a package uninstall." -- Pat
