Re: License tag for perl modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 12:05 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "RN" == Robin Norwood <rnorwood@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> RN> So you may want to update the license field as you go (Not
> RN> blindly, of course...there are probably exceptions).
> 
> I think there may be a few modules out there which are Artistic
> _only_, which it seems makes them unacceptable for Fedora.  I honestly
> had no clue that the artistic license was considered non-free until
> spot started the recent licensing work.

The fundamental question would be: Is this consideration applicable at
all?

Consider: Most perl packages are scripts and not linked against
anything. They "use" other packages.

Ralf



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux