On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:21:55AM -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> ...and along the same lines, is there benefit to using %{__perl} vs
> just plain "perl" or "/usr/bin/perl" in spec files? I generally try
> to avoid the macro-ised versions of utils, but it sounds like there
> may be benefit to this. (See also BZ#237883)
Theoretically using the macro would make it easier for someone to
build a package against a non-standard perl. (Redefining %{__perl},
%{perl_vendorlib}, and %{perl_vendorarch} should be all you'd need for
most modules...)
Steve
--
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve@xxxxxxxxx http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320
