On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 10:06 +0100, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > On 21/02/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Q2: I haven't yet checked, if perl-Test-LongString's upstream is just > > overly restrictive and if older perl(Test::Builder::Tester) modules also > > would suffice. > > Hi, thanks for maintaining an rpm of my module :) Feel invited to take over or to co-maintain it - I've got enough of other perl-modules ;) > the dependency on Test::Builder::Tester is only needed to run the > regression tests. Otherwise they'll fail due to bugs in > Test::Builder::Tester. For the proper operation of Test::LongString > you don't need Test::Builder::Tester at all. OK, so you are saying, ignoring the warning and continuing as if it wasn't present is the way to go? This would be the simplest work-around to my issue (esp. because the running tests doesn't expose any error at all :) ). Ralf
