Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [RFE] sa package should setup sa-update https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219078 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-14 13:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #21) > Red Hat is not fully comfortable with sa-update just yet, because it relies on > an external data source. For this reason we don't want to officially endorse > its use. It's the same source that released the rules the initial package bundles, and last I've seen people trusted the Apache foundation > How hard is it to make your own one-liner cron entry to run sa-update? It wasn't hard for me, just annoying (create the key directory the package forget, locate the right gpg key, make it available for sa, find the right update command…) For your run-of-the-mill user though, it's way over the hassle ceiling, he'll just notice sa performance degrades quickly and fedora does not "just work" as it should. Given how spam is evolving if Red Hat is not comfortable with direct upstream rule feeds it will have to set up its own update server sooner or later (same applies for pyzor BTW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
