Re: replacing files owned by another package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 17:35 +0200, Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> probably a faq:
> 
> Is there a 'proper' way to replace files owned by another (not
> obsoleted) package?
> 
> Related: Is it possible at all to update Modules that come bundled with
> the perl package?
> 
> Background: I'm currently building rpms for catalyst and svk, both need
> never versions of some bundled Modules. Is there a clean way, or would I
> have to repacke perl itself?

Ehhh... right now there is no way (at least, none that I can think of)
to update to newer versions of modules included in the base perl
package, other than to get them updated in the base perl package.

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux