[Bug 185542] New: perlbug #38657: Using import() with arguments with -d: broke in 5.8.8, was okay in 5.8.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185542

           Summary: perlbug #38657: Using import() with arguments with -d:
                    broke in 5.8.8, was okay in 5.8.7
           Product: Red Hat Certified Stacks
           Version: LAMPv1
          Platform: All
               URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=38657
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: perl
        AssignedTo: jvdias@xxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: jvdias@xxxxxxxxxx
         QAContact: dkl@xxxxxxxxxx
                CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx,wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx


+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #183553 +++

Description of problem:

Copied from perlbug #38657: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/index.html?q=38657 :

Using import() with arguments with -d: broke in 5.8.8, was okay in 5.8.7.

$ mkdir -p lib/Devel
$ echo 'package Devel::Foo; sub import { print "import(@_)" } sub
\ DB::DB { } 1' > lib/Devel/Foo.pm
$ /tmp/jhi/p587/bin/perl -wIlib -d:Foo -le 1
import(Devel::Foo)
$ /tmp/jhi/p588/bin/perl -wIlib -d:Foo -le 1
import(Devel::Foo)
$ /tmp/jhi/p587/bin/perl -wIlib -d:Foo=bar -le 1
import(Devel::Foo bar)
$ /tmp/jhi/p588/bin/perl -wIlib -d:Foo=bar -le 1
Can't find string terminator ";" anywhere before EOF.
$ 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
See above

-- Additional comment from jvdias@xxxxxxxxxx on 2006-03-01 16:53 EST --
I have reproduced this problem, and confirmed the code above used to work on
perl-5.8.6 . Suggested fix:
---
From: "Rafael Garcia-Suarez" <rgarciasuarez@xxxxxxxxx>
  To: perl5-porters@xxxxxxxx
Date: 2006-03-01 16:16

On 3/1/06, via RT jhi @ ugli. hut. fi <perlbug-followup@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> $ /tmp/jhi/p587/bin/perl -wIlib -d:Foo=bar -le 1
> import(Devel::Foo bar)
> $ /tmp/jhi/p588/bin/perl -wIlib -d:Foo=bar -le 1
> Can't find string terminator ";" anywhere before EOF.

Bad news, guys. This patch solves it :

==== //depot/perl/perl.c#736 - /home/rafael/p4blead/perl.c ====
--- /home/rafael/tmp/tmp.9616.0 2006-03-01 22:18:07.000000000 +0100
+++ /home/rafael/p4blead/perl.c 2006-03-01 22:18:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -3031,7 +3031,7 @@ Perl_moreswitches(pTHX_ char *s)
                sv_catpv(sv, start);
            else {
                sv_catpvn(sv, start, s-start);
-               Perl_sv_catpvf(aTHX_ sv, " split(/,/,q%c%s%c)", 0, ++s, 0);
+               Perl_sv_catpvf(aTHX_ sv, " split(/,/,q(%s))", ++s);
            }
            s += strlen(s);
            my_setenv("PERL5DB", SvPV_nolen_const(sv));

That means that using \0 as a q() delimiter no longer works.
---

Now testing this.

-- Additional comment from jvdias@xxxxxxxxxx on 2006-03-01 17:08 EST --
Actually, the above fix was for bleadperl; I think it's probably better to revert
to 5.8.7's code for the above, which was:
---
            /* We now allow -d:Module=Foo,Bar */
            while(isALNUM(*s) || *s==':') ++s;
            if (*s != '=')
                sv_catpv(sv, start);
            else {
                sv_catpvn(sv, start, s-start);
                sv_catpv(sv, " split(/,/,q{");
                sv_catpv(sv, ++s);
                sv_catpv(sv, "})");
            }
---


-- Additional comment from rgarciasuarez@xxxxxxxxxxxx on 2006-03-01 17:11 EST --
Hold on guys, the patch I posted on P5P is just here to demonstrate the cause of
the problem, not to be applied. q\0foo\0 ought to be equivalent to 'foo'. It was
working in previous perls. Still looking for a proper fix (sorry for haven't
been clear enough)

-- Additional comment from jvdias@xxxxxxxxxx on 2006-03-01 17:21 EST --
Yes, I noticed that - I'm not applying anything yet - I'm also still investigating
- many thanks, Rafael


-- Additional comment from jvdias@xxxxxxxxxx on 2006-03-01 18:07 EST --
Actually, under perl-5.8.0, perl-5.8.5, perl-5.8.6, and perl-5.8.7, 
'q\0foo\0' does NOT work (I have tested all versions) - I get the
same result :

$ perl -e '$s=q\0foo\0;'
Number found where operator expected at -e line 1, near "q\0foo\0"
syntax error at -e line 1, near "q\0foo\0"
Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.

This is because '\' is a legal delimiter for q(), and the parse breaks
on the last '0;' .

$ perl -e '$s=q\0foo\; print $s,"\n";'
0foo

But if I actually create a file with 'q{0x0}foo{0x0}', it DOES work OK on all 
versions:

$ cat tq.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
$s=q0foo0;
print "$s\n";
$ ./tq.pl
q0foo0
$ tr '0' '\0' < tq.pl > tq0.pl
$ od -c tq0.pl
0000000   #   !   /   u   s   r   /   b   i   n   /   p   e   r   l  \n
0000020   $   s   =   q  \0   f   o   o  \0   ;  \n   p   r   i   n   t
0000040       "   $   s   \   n   "   ;  \n
0000051
$ ./tq0.pl
foo

So q\0foo\0 with real, unescaped 0x0 chars DOES work OK on all versions .

I think it is just that 0x0 is a bad choice for a '%c' in Perl_sv_catpvf, as
it terminates the C string, and the interpreter doesn't get the rest of the
expression . So I think the first fix posted is OK .

If we really must make Perl_sv_catpvf handle 0x0 chars OK in expressions, 
that is a different problem - I think it is debatable whether it is a problem
worth fixing.

-- Additional comment from rgarciasuarez@xxxxxxxxxxxx on 2006-03-01 18:14 EST --
Actually it works, yes, but due to shell quoting, you need to be clever :

$ perl -le 'print eval "q\0foo\0"'
foo

and that was what I meant.
The problem was with the setenv, a bit later, because setenv expects
\0-terminated strings. Fixed upstream now. Looks like my first patch was correct
after all :)

-- Additional comment from jvdias@xxxxxxxxxx on 2006-03-01 18:47 EST --
fixed with perl-5.8.8-4, now in rawhide

-- Additional comment from wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx on 2006-03-01 22:22 EST --
No, now it is in rawhide (moving now).  I'm guessing that Jason has been very
careful about testing this change like many previous changes that I've seen him
do.  Great work Jason.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Devel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Information]
  Powered by Linux