Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2005-11-12 23:51 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > I think the bundling makes sense in this case. I could not disagree more. * Readonly-XS and Readonly are independent, there is no dependency between both. Actually, Readonly-XS is a sort of overlay plugin to Readonly * Readonly is noarch/Readonly-XS is arch'ed. Probs will occur, should Readonly-XS not be buildable on one particular architecture. * Splitting both makes the *specs much simpler and less error-prone. => There is no technically need to merge these perl-dists into one, therefore there is no need to make an exception from the FE packaging rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
