Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Misnamed package, add Provides? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165885 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2005-08-16 03:11 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > I thought that the package naming guidelines would have adviced to use > perl-$CPANDIST, but instead it goes on to say things about "the CPAN module > name". Can we agree upon this and make this mandatory for FE? Is there consenus on this? > IMO, that makes no sense because the unit of CPAN module packaging is a CPAN > _distribution_, and the vast majority those distributions contain more than > one module. What's "the CPAN module name" then? Just using the CPAN > distribution name would work, and is already used in all CPAN packages I'm > aware of. I would not bet on FC, but I guess, you are right as far as FE is concerned. How to proceed with this package? 1. Apply cvs tricks (I.e. an admin moving the files in CVS)? 2. Re-import the package into CVS under "perl-gettext" and "cvs rm" perl-Locale-gettext? 3. Let it be in FC-4 and re-import it as "perl-gettext" into "devel"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
