On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 17:52 -0700, Warren Togami wrote: > Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote: > > No. Just trying to play safe: this may avoid CGI/mod_perl related > > bugzilla entries from ppl that will upgrade the FC3 mod_perl 2 beta > > version to the final version. > > The way I understand it, we had mod_perl 1.99 for *years*. Since 2 is > incompatible, doesn't it make sense to keep FC3 compatible with 1.99? IMO, yes. Upgrading CGI.pm beyond 3.07 in FC3 without upgrading mod_perl would actually be a bad idea; CGI.pm versions >= 3.08 don't support mod_perl 2 versions < 2.0.0-RC5. On the other hand, CGI.pm 3.06 and 3.07 do have some fixes that would benefit FC3 mod_perl users.
