Re: Wildfly installation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


> Am 03.06.2021 um 15:43 schrieb Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 8:59 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The guidelines currently say this:
>>  Bundling and Duplication of system libraries
>>  <>
>> This obviously has been written with C programs in mind.
> Please stop repeating this obvious falsehood. It's not true. It
> started with C/C++ sure, but it has applied reasonably well to most
> language ecosystems too.

It is that „Reasonable" what might be worth discussing (not a C/C++ ancestry), or whether, what was reasonable at the time still is today. Perhaps some "reasonable" adjustments are worth considering.

> Patching one thing once and rebuild (or
> rebuilds each reverse dep if static linked) is better than patching
> one thing >500 different ways and rebuilding each instance.

Unfortunately, that is not the problem in the case of Wildfly building. Instead of having >500 different ways and rebuilding, we have nothing to build at all, because it is not buildable that way (with existing resources). So, letting Wildfly build everything it needs into one (or some) rpms would make nothing worse, but only better. Of course, this is a very specific individual case and not suitable for generalization. 
java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines:
List Archives:
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux