Re: Beware: java-1.8.0-openjdk SIGSEGVs / SIGABRTs in rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:18 AM Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 15/03/2020 14:02, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > The latest java-1.8.0-openjdk update for rawhide (the first build with
> > GCC 10) seems to have introduced some serious problems - including
> > crashes and segmentation faults during package builds for Java
> > packages.
> >
> > The broken update landed in rawhide with the
> > Fedora-Rawhide-20200313.n.0 compose:
> > java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.242.b06-0.0.ea.fc32 ->
> > java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.242.b08-0.fc33
> >
> > I haven't been able to reproduce the crashes reliably, so I assume
> > it's something that's either randomly triggered, or dependent on the
> > specific hardware / architecture (but this seems to affect at least
> > x86_64, i686, and aarch64, so I'm not so sure it's architecture
> > related).
> >
> > koschei started complaining about a whole lot of Java packages since
> > the update landed:
> >
> > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/affected-by/java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless?epoch1=1&version1=1.8.0.242.b06&release1=0.0.ea.fc32&epoch2=1&version2=1.8.0.242.b08&release2=0.fc33&collection=f33
> >
> > The same java-1.8.0-openjdk update has also landed in f32
> > updates-testing, but I haven't been able to reproduce any crashes with
> > that version (so far), so I'm not sure if this is also affecting the
> > f32 update, or if it's isolated to rawhide.
> >
> > Here's the - seemingly unaffected - f32 update for the same version:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-af190951f6
> >
> > I've reported this issue here:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813550
> >
> > Does somebody have experience with debugging the JVM? Please help :D
> >
> > Fabio
> >

(snip)

> The OpenJDK package itself is no different to the one that's been in
> earlier versions of Fedora since January [0] [1]. I believe GCC 10 is
> the issue here.

I belive so.

> It has taken a significant effort to even get java-1.8.0-openjdk to
> build with GCC 10 [2], mainly by turning off a number of optimisations,
> and a backlog of changes has built up. We really need to be getting
> these packages updated for the next security update this time next month.
>
> Do you know if F32 & rawhide are using the same GCC?

fedora 32 and rawhide have the same version of GCC (10.0.1).
rawhide is at: gcc-10.0.1-0.9.fc33
fedora 32 has gcc-10.0.1-0.8.fc32 in stable, and gcc-10.0.1-0.9.fc32
in updates-testing.

I've now been able to reproduce JVM crashes with the
java-1.8.0-openjdk build from fedora f32 updates-testing as well
(which is the first build of openjdk with GCC 10).

Fabio

> [0] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1435761
> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1435767
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795268
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Senior Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
> Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
>
_______________________________________________
java-devel mailing list -- java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to java-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux