Re: junit5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi gil,

awesome! We should use junit5 for latest jmockit, and make the tests work for both junit and jmockit. Not much senseful to package without, no?

~R.


Am Sonntag, 17. Juli 2016 12:51:27 CEST schrieb gil:
Hi

Is available a first draft of JUnit5 [1]
yet to be fixed:

jopt-simple = 5.0.2

The test suite is not yet possible to perform

due to some addictions to update or missing:

de.schauderhaft.degraph:degraph-check:0.1.3(not available)

org.assertj:assertj-core:3.4.1

org.spockframework:spock-core:1.0-groovy-2.4

org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core:2.6.1
org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-jul:2.6.1

Sorry for the noise

Regards

.g


[1] https://gil.fedorapeople.org/junit5-5.0.0-0.1.M1.fc23.src.rpm

https://gil.fedorapeople.org/junit5.spec


https://gil.fedorapeople.org/opentest4j-1.0.0-0.1.M1.fc23.src.rpm

https://gil.fedorapeople.org/opentest4j.spec






--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux