On 16 April 2014 14:35, Deepak Bhole <dbhole@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Mat Booth <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2014-04-16 04:36]:
I agree, it should be retired. I have done so in pkgdb.>
>
>
> On 15 April 2014 17:55, Fedora Rawhide Report <rawhide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> Broken deps for i386
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> [sinjdoc]
> sinjdoc-0.5-16.fc21.i686 requires java-gcj-compat >= 0:1.0.70
> sinjdoc-0.5-16.fc21.i686 requires java-gcj-compat >= 0:1.0.70
>
>
> Can sinjdoc be retired now? I can't think of a case where you would use it over
> the OpenJDK implementation of javadoc.
>
Thanks for bringing it to attention!
Deepak
No problem.
It's still showing up in the rawhide report however. If you use "fedpkg retire" command, that should also automatically block the package in rawhide.
It's still showing up in the rawhide report however. If you use "fedpkg retire" command, that should also automatically block the package in rawhide.
-- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
