On 03/03/2014 02:54 PM, David Juran wrote: > What I actually did was just to do > java.security.Security.addProvider(new BouncyCastleProvider()) without > much further checking. But I guess if > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711090 got solved, I > wouldn't even have to do that. I just looked at this. This seems to apply to the old GCJ/Classpath only, not OpenJDK. I am not sure that file is marked as config for OpenJDK. but there really should be a better mechanism for this in Linux. I think there is no difference installing it dynamically the way you did, which is correct. The static install obviously makes it available automatically to all applications and there is no need to import any bouncycastle classes directly. -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
