On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 18:00 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 01/29/2014 05:43 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > For cases like objectweb-asm and netty I don't see a problem as the provides are properly versioned. > > Let's say I have a package which requires ASM3: > > Require-Bundle: org.objectweb.asm;bundle-version="[3.0.0,4.0.0)" > > That package will have Requires: osgi(org.objectweb.asm). YUM will > install objectweb-asm package (version 5.x) because it has shorter name. > I think there is a problem, but I'm not sure what's the right solution. IMHO this example isn't a good one as a "case" for duplicate OSGi provides. What your example shows is that RPM does not allow one to express version ranges like OSGi can. I'd say the spec should rather have: Requires: osgi(org.objectweb-asm) = <BUNDLE_VERSION> It's not great, but probably more accurately what you'd want. Anyhow, there's likely a problem with both approaches depending on your use-case. Cheers, Severin -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
