----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerard Ryan" <galileo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: "vladimir kostadinov" <vladimir.kostadinov@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 10:43:03 AM
> Subject: Eclipse WTP problems...
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> ...there are many :/
>
> Hi java folk,
>
> None of the Eclipse WTP stack is currently built on f19, and most of it
> needs to be updated, and upstream has moved from cvs to git. I'm going
> to focus as much of my time-available-to-spend-on-fedora as I can, to
> rectifying that, but I'm running into some issues that I'll need help
> with:
>
> 1. eclipse-wtp-common has been bundling a jar for a long time[0], and I
> tried to fix that, by deleting and rebuilding that jar using javac/jar
> commands. Problem is I was using %{_libdir} to add a jar from
> eclipse-platform to the classpath, and eclipse-platform is archfull but
> this package is noarch. Is there a better solution? It's not my package,
> so I don't want to do something like make it archfull if that's not
> necessary.
>
> 2. I've proposed a patch for eclipse-wtp-servertools[1] a while back
> that hasn't seen any activity.
>
> Eclipse WTP packages in Fedora basically need to be build in the order:
> common, servertools, sourceediting, webservices (I can't remember what's
> after that, but the rest are mostly my packages, so I'll figure that out
> when I get that far). The problem here is that the first three are not
> mine, and the maintainer for servertools/sourceediting doesn't seem to
> be very active at the moment, and I'm not going to try to update
> sourceediting and propose a patch until I can build it against common
> and servertools without having to hack unmerged packages into mock. I've
> applied for acls on both in pkgdb, and I'm happy to spend time whipping
> them into shape, since a significant percentage of my packages depend on
> them directly.
>
> There are other problems with WTP packages, but these are the most
> immediate ones, and the others escape me right now. If anybody can
> propose solutions to the above, or move things along in any way, I'd
> really appreciate it!
commit solution is done - your commit requests are approved now.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> Thanks,
> Gerard.
>
> [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922452
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=927023
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRcPWHAAoJEG7cfkpivEoVNAUP/3laSOwQTBDGTYuEP3cvbQm4
> XqbHrMq6s0yHeXmDLE+2SwM6+JZ/1il69p4jVWwqi9hlB1ESUMP8v0w1pCRG0GRL
> rZSYrGhxOLg1IYZMjGY8Ov+L6Q84N53mCZJIcUW9Henc32CGoPdWTojvYiu+fCXW
> o/eQd0ILxyaqrcom4kIGzNlnmurc0p40NmBNHL4d51wjTUjz6Vt17pXPBvMfXjnK
> v3x3Jza4usE2YOYR4FD9sLISZEoBNSkkPsedIqYTwoZ/VwSB0bDrwQkDSJ6HVqGd
> iHbfomxNf5SrCu4dybAsrai/RFhv8fhGeFm5VpBE6b+6hfi5aEaKUZaCL9ZlCSOE
> ZUAmQ6PqJ7BYoyXMCMDRFVr55JXZCR73oQ9APdqCsM12IAzQqHP3bmmhV0iRpqEr
> LezK438iU8PlcLAA9m1g/XSwfzQi7+av5oV1mVddzIwBsZu2M8bKcGdH3w3XoG4I
> TBmfMSZo1HBjEdFWKPpTJ/X0LYUkRkXbWqOGvlsYFqVg/Zh424LYI9yi0Pkqpc5G
> OobhT3bCJ3SpDiKYPBGH7dSM6lCN1N5cUy5w2pWhlejpoUhnHqXRlvdr621tMwKN
> o9KskhVXZxCdQFgHANY7d6/mXofmYQxDtDc1t+dEA4DWsa6hP8GBV0TUeEQxx2Rm
> nDZ/CrDLItHYX92mINFL
> =KoBh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
