Aaand...forgot to Cc Deepak so doing it now, sorry for the noise
Quoting Stanislav Ochotnicky (2012-08-29 11:20:54)
> We've encountered some minor issues with a few package which were kind
> of hard to track down. They were partially caused by a bug in yum which
> causes both gcj and openjdk being pulled in when only one of them should
> be. The other part was small and hard to spot packaging issues which
> caused gcj getting accidentaly pulled into BR instead openjdk
>
> Now there are legitimate reasons to require gcj directly, but I'd like
> to propose removing "Provides: java = %{javaver}" (and -devel
> counterpart). I think leaving rest of the provides should not be an
> issue.
>
> This way we'll be able to remove obscure need for "Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0"
>
> I am CCing Deepak as primary maintainer. Does anyone have strong
> objections for said removal?
>
> --
> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
>
> PGP: 7B087241
> Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
