Re: osgi system bundle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I would, but such a line does not exist.  The only Require-Bundle line
has org.apache.xerces

Further, I am assuming that the script driving these deps is
/usr/lib/rpm/osgideps.pl , and I get this:

$ echo /usr/share/java/xalan-j2.jar | /usr/lib/rpm/osgideps.pl --requires
osgi(org.apache.xerces)

so I don't really understand where the system.bundle requirement is coming from.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
<akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just remove the system.bundle from Require-Bundle tag in the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file in the jar.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Andy Grimm" <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "java-devel" <java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Krzysztof Daniel" <kdaniel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:55:39 PM
>> Subject: Re:  osgi system bundle
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
>> <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Andy Grimm" <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> To: "java-devel" <java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 6:03:38 PM
>> >> Subject:  osgi system bundle
>> >>
>> >> Hi, all.  This morning I was dealing with a build issue related to
>> >> broken eclipse package, and it surprised me that eclipse was being
>> >> pulled into my buildroot for a random java package.  The root of
>> >> this
>> >> is that osgi(system.bundle) is provided by eclipse-rcp, which
>> >> requires
>> >> eclipse-platform, and osgi(system.bundle) is now being required by
>> >> some fairly commonly used java packages:
>> >>
>> >> xalan-j2-0:2.7.1-13.fc18.noarch
>> >> xbean-0:3.11.1-3.fc18.noarch
>> >> xml-commons-apis-0:1.4.01-7.fc18.noarch
>> >> xml-commons-resolver-0:1.2-9.fc18.noarch
>> >>
>> >> In particular, xalan-j2 is required for pretty much the entire
>> >> java
>> >> ecosystem, including ant, maven, groovy, various apache-commons
>> >> packages, etc.
>> >>
>> >> So what's the rationale for this?  Perhaps this is a bug? Maybe
>> >> something needs to be subpackaged differently?  The current state
>> >> of
>> >> things seems a bit bloated to me.
>> >
>> > Well, these are bugs in the packages you mentioned. See
>> > http://wiki.osgi.org/wiki/System_Bundle for description what
>> > system.bundle is. There is no point in any bundle requiring
>> > system.bundle unless they call stuff from org.osgi.framework which
>> > neither xalan-j2 nor xml-commons do. Please open bug reports
>> > against the respective packages to fix their osgi manifests.
>>
>> Ok, I can open the bugs, but I'm actually the owner of xalan-j2, so
>> that's just going to come right back to me. (and actually, somebody
>> just emailed xalan-j2-owners about it).  :-)  Could you help me
>> determine the correct way to get rid of this dep?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> > TBH, we probably can move the system.bundle provide (it's manual)
>> > to eclipse-equinox-osgi. Chris, would you please take care of
>> > moving this provides.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Alex
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Alex
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Andy
>> >> --
>> >> java-devel mailing list
>> >> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
>>
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux