I would, but such a line does not exist. The only Require-Bundle line has org.apache.xerces Further, I am assuming that the script driving these deps is /usr/lib/rpm/osgideps.pl , and I get this: $ echo /usr/share/java/xalan-j2.jar | /usr/lib/rpm/osgideps.pl --requires osgi(org.apache.xerces) so I don't really understand where the system.bundle requirement is coming from. On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Just remove the system.bundle from Require-Bundle tag in the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file in the jar. > > Regards, > Alex > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Andy Grimm" <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> >> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: "java-devel" <java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Krzysztof Daniel" <kdaniel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:55:39 PM >> Subject: Re: osgi system bundle >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov >> <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: "Andy Grimm" <agrimm@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> To: "java-devel" <java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 6:03:38 PM >> >> Subject: osgi system bundle >> >> >> >> Hi, all. This morning I was dealing with a build issue related to >> >> broken eclipse package, and it surprised me that eclipse was being >> >> pulled into my buildroot for a random java package. The root of >> >> this >> >> is that osgi(system.bundle) is provided by eclipse-rcp, which >> >> requires >> >> eclipse-platform, and osgi(system.bundle) is now being required by >> >> some fairly commonly used java packages: >> >> >> >> xalan-j2-0:2.7.1-13.fc18.noarch >> >> xbean-0:3.11.1-3.fc18.noarch >> >> xml-commons-apis-0:1.4.01-7.fc18.noarch >> >> xml-commons-resolver-0:1.2-9.fc18.noarch >> >> >> >> In particular, xalan-j2 is required for pretty much the entire >> >> java >> >> ecosystem, including ant, maven, groovy, various apache-commons >> >> packages, etc. >> >> >> >> So what's the rationale for this? Perhaps this is a bug? Maybe >> >> something needs to be subpackaged differently? The current state >> >> of >> >> things seems a bit bloated to me. >> > >> > Well, these are bugs in the packages you mentioned. See >> > http://wiki.osgi.org/wiki/System_Bundle for description what >> > system.bundle is. There is no point in any bundle requiring >> > system.bundle unless they call stuff from org.osgi.framework which >> > neither xalan-j2 nor xml-commons do. Please open bug reports >> > against the respective packages to fix their osgi manifests. >> >> Ok, I can open the bugs, but I'm actually the owner of xalan-j2, so >> that's just going to come right back to me. (and actually, somebody >> just emailed xalan-j2-owners about it). :-) Could you help me >> determine the correct way to get rid of this dep? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Andy >> >> >> > TBH, we probably can move the system.bundle provide (it's manual) >> > to eclipse-equinox-osgi. Chris, would you please take care of >> > moving this provides. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Alex >> > >> > Regards, >> > Alex >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> >> Andy >> >> -- >> >> java-devel mailing list >> >> java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel >> -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
