Re: Can we go to Groovy 2.0?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sounds like a plan.

Can you pickup the latest from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809950#c15, build it on F17 (or rawhide) and fire off a Hibernate 4 build?

I think we should just stick the issues we find into bz 809950, unless they are Hibernate 4 specific.

Carlo

On 07/05/2012 09:55 AM, Dan Allen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One more project lost for us thanks to gradle :(

There's no doubt, the adoption of Gradle has slowed down updates until the packaging is complete. But, software is going to change, that's just the nature of it. Nothing has been lost, we just have to rise together to the new challenge. We could have said the same thing about Maven builds before you all did the innovative work of integrating that into rpmbuild.

It's becoming very clear to me, though, that we need to get more information out there (this list is as good as any) on the status of the Gradle packaging. That will help everyone set schedules and expectations better. Let's frame it as a challenge, not a problem.

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597




--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel


--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux