Re: Can we go to Groovy 2.0?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Allen" <dan.j.allen@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Johannes Lips" <johannes.lips@xxxxxxxxx>, java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, July 5, 2012 10:55:00 AM
> Subject: Re:  Can we go to Groovy 2.0?
> 
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov <
> akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> One more project lost for us thanks to gradle :(
> 
> 
> 
> There's no doubt, the adoption of Gradle has slowed down updates
> until the packaging is complete. But, software is going to change,
> that's just the nature of it. Nothing has been lost, we just have to
> rise together to the new challenge. We could have said the same
> thing about Maven builds before you all did the innovative work of
> integrating that into rpmbuild.

Sadly to support Gradle new blood is needed as the current maintainers are having hard time keeping Maven+friends up to date.

Alex

> 
> 
> It's becoming very clear to me, though, that we need to get more
> information out there (this list is as good as any) on the status of
> the Gradle packaging. That will help everyone set schedules and
> expectations better. Let's frame it as a challenge, not a problem.
> 
> 
> -Dan
> 
> --
> 
> Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in
> Action
> Registered Linux User #231597
> 
> 
> http://google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
> http://mojavelinux.com
> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
> 
> 
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux