2012/5/3 Stanislav Ochotnicky > > Quoting Guido Grazioli (2012-05-02 09:22:36) > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723779 > > > > Are there any other reasons for requiring jpackage-utils on -javadoc subpkgs? > > I could not find anything specific in the java guidelines, except in the > > ant and maven templates. > > > > $ rpm -qvl jpackage-utils | grep javadoc > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Mar 30 15:00 /usr/share/javadoc > > I.e. jpackage-utils provides main javadoc directory Yep that was what I pointed out myself in the bug above, but then I was directed to this[1], and doubts started to arise. Even if, actually, -javadocs packages seem to fit perfectly the "an exception" warning box in that page. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function -- Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli@xxxxxxxxx> Via Parri 11 48011 - Alfonsine (RA) (Italy) 3 Baltic Circuit - 3030 Point Cook - VIC (Australia) Mobile: +39 347 1017202 (10-18 GMT+12) Key FP = 7040 F398 0DED A737 7337 DAE1 12DC A698 5E81 2278 Linked in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/guidograzioli -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
