Excerpts from Guido Grazioli's message of Tue Jul 19 12:03:17 +0200 2011: > 2011/7/19 Alexander Kurtakov: > > maven-ant-tasks should depend on maven-project not on maven2. And for it to > > work properly you might need to create a file in /etc/ant.d adding maven- > > project and whatever else jars are needed to the classpath. Please do that in > > the maven-ant-tasks or open a bug with patch we can apply. > > i wasn't aware of this ant.d mechanism; i found that a bunch of packages > need to be added there, should i open a bug for each one? or just > add it as additional info in the bug requesting to make maven-ant-tasks > require them? > > it turns also out that one of the needed classes is in > maven-error-diagnostics.jar > which is provided by maven2 main package; if we want to get rid of maven2 > completely i think it has to be split in a package on its own The thing is: maven2 package has been split into smaller chunks. * maven-project * maven-artifact-manager * maven-plugin-registry * maven-monitor * maven-model * maven-profile * maven-toolchain And of course main maven2 package. We did this to more easily figure out what parts of maven2 are still required by our packages. I went jar-by-jar as they were needed. Now it seems I'll create another subpackage for error-diagnostics. It would be ideal if upstream simply got rid of those dependencies or split those parts into separate projects, but I won't hold my breath for it. Problem is that some package that used to BR/R maven2 should now require one or more of the above subpackages. While not ideal, it's the only sane way to slowly phase-out maven2. If nothing else at least we'll know which packages still require it. > >> This probably also needs fixing? > >> # rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/java/maven2/maven-project.jar > >> maven-project-2.2.1-25.fc16.noarch > >> maven2-2.2.1-25.fc16.noarch > > Yes, this definetely needs fixing. Please open a bug report. > > ok, bug also has already been taken care of ;) > > Forgot to thank you and Stanislav for taking care of the packages I own > and that i have a little overlooked lately! I have as well? Heh, I guess since I became provenpackager I've been committing everywhere without looking much (usually the problems took less time to fix than filing of a bugreport). I am just glad I haven't stepped on anyone's toes yet... Regards, -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
