On 08:49:36 AM Wednesday, May 11, 2011 Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm looking at packaging jmock 2.5.1. Package is here: > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/jmock-2.5.1-1.fc15.src.rpm > > Build log: > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/rpmbuild.log > > Error is during the tests: > > [junit] Testcase: > testCanMockTypesFromADynamicClassLoader(org.jmock.test.unit.lib.JavaReflect > ionImposteriserTests): Caused an ERROR > [junit] Invalid superclass index 0 in class file $UniqueTypeName$ > [junit] java.lang.ClassFormatError: Invalid superclass index 0 in > class file $UniqueTypeName$ > [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) > [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634) > [junit] at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:480) > [junit] at > org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.synthesiseIn > terface(SyntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.java:43) [junit] at > org.jmock.test.unit.support.SyntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.findClass(Sy > ntheticEmptyInterfaceClassLoader.java:25) [junit] at > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:321) [junit] at > java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:266) [junit] at > org.jmock.test.unit.lib.JavaReflectionImposteriserTests.testCanMockTypesFro > mADynamicClassLoader(JavaReflectionImposteriserTests.java:38) > > I have no idea about this. I've applied two patches. One to use > objectweb classes directly rather than from cglib, and one derived from > the 2.6.0-RC2 release to support java 1.6. It looks like the given test case doesn't support the class format used. Could it be that your java 1.6 patch missed some test cases? As jmock hasn't been in Fedora before I would have chosen 2.6.0-RC2 if it is supposed to handle java 1.6 classes Alex > > Any help would be appreciated. -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
