On 09:37 Mon 07 Mar , Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: > Excerpts from Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL's message of Thu Mar 03 22:36:40 +0100 2011: > > I know that people have asked in the past about removing gcj from Fedora > > in favor of OpenJDK, and I'm aware that this has not happened for > > reasons including architecture support on some platforms. I don't know > > when this was assessed last, but I'm leaving that question alone for now. > > Actually we discussed this during our SIG meetings and recent changes > to Java packaging guidelines[1] reflect this. We are discouraging > building with GCJ support, but these guidelines are relatively new so > it will take some time for packages to be rebuilt with respect to new > guidelines. My guess is F-16, partially also F-15. > There are some places where AOT is still needed e.g. ecj is much slower when not using AOT. -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://icedtea.classpath.org PGP Key: F5862A37 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EA30 D855 D50F 90CD F54D 0698 0713 C3ED F586 2A37 -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
