Re: Orphaning of classpathx-jaf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08:21:08 pm Wednesday, December 15, 2010 Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On 12/15/2010 04:47 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I noticed you recently retired classpathx-jaf. There are still quite a
> > 
> > few packages requiring this package though:
> >  $ repoquery --whatrequires classpathx-jaf
> > 
> > classpathx-jaf-0:1.0-15.1.fc12.x86_64
> > ant-javamail-0:1.7.1-12.fc12.x86_64
> > ant-javamail-0:1.7.1-13.fc13.x86_64
> > axis-0:1.2.1-7.fc12.x86_64
> > classpathx-mail-0:1.1.1-9.1.fc12.x86_64
> > dumbster-0:1.6-9.fc12.noarch
> > ec2-api-tools-0:1.3.53907-3.fc14.noarch
> > javatar-0:2.5-2.fc13.x86_64
> > mx4j-1:3.0.1-9.9.fc12.x86_64
> > mx4j-1:3.0.1-9.11.fc13.noarch
> > tomcat5-0:5.5.27-7.4.fc12.noarch
> > + gdata-java for BR
> 
> Ah, sorry. This is actually only javatar and gdata-java in rawhide.
> Still it would have been nicer if you would send email to their owners
> first :-)
> 
> javatar itself was fixed already in rawhide by orionp by requiring java
> 
> >= 1:1.6.0 (that's the information that should have been in dead.package
> 
> IMO).

Sorry about that. It's entirely my fault. Classpathx-jaf has been merged into 
gcj long long time ago. It is now obsoleted by java-1.5.0-gcj but not provided 
in order to not having do this for every JVM out there. You don't need to BR 
java >=1:1.6.0 but just >= 1:1.5.0 . 
Every occurance of jaf should be simply removed as we no longer ship pre 1.5 
JVMs. 

P.S. I'm the one that added the obsolete and asked devrim to deprecate it.

Regards,
Alex
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux