Re: Secondary review of a Java package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> But none of us is experienced in packaging Java.

I recommend looking at the Fedora Java packaging guidelines (you
probably already did this):

  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java

> We would appreciate if someone more familiar with that also could have
> a second look at the package, from the perspective of packaging Java
> in particular.  Is there anyone here who would like to do that?
> 
> Spec: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX.spec

Things look fine after a cursory glance .spec.  The only issues I see are:

- java{,-devel} >= 1.6 -> java{,-devel} >= 1:1.6.0
- do you really want the gcj stuff?

HTH,

Andrew
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux