sön 2010-07-11 klockan 11:13 +0200 skrev Chris Spike: > On 07/08/2010 04:59 PM, Andrew Overholt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > * Chris Spike <chris.spike@xxxxxxxx> [2010-07-08 06:43]: > >> As long as there is an unversioned dir, I actually don't see any > >> problems (or necessity for the versioned symlink), but I'm curious: Is > >> there any recommendation on this? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java > > Unfortunately not. Neither on Packaging:Java nor on the draft update[1] > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Abo/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate Yeah, the current guidelines do not say anything clear about it, but the samples say %{name}. In the draft it says both ways are allowed, but that doesn't really help much. The samples still say %{name}. I don't have any strong opinion. %{name} is simpler, but %{name}-%{version} in analogous with /usr/share/doc. /Alexander -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
