On 07/08/2010 10:50 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>>> * Chris Spike<chris.spike@xxxxxxxx> [2010-07-08 15:59]:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is there a recommendation on the name of the pom file for java packages?
>>>> There is a template in the wiki[1] that tells me to name it
>>>> JPP-%{name}.pom, but actually most packages call it JPP.%{name}.pom or
>>>> JPP-%{short_name}.pom.
>>>> Even apache-commons packages are non consistent (e.g.
>>>> JPP-commons-codec.pom, JPP-apache-commons-math.pom,
>>>> JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom or JPP-jakarta-commons-net.pom) so I guess
>>>> this is up to taste?
>>>>
>
> It is up to taste I guess. As long as the name follows the rules here,
> it will continue to work:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/JPPMavenReadme#POM_file_names
It says:
JPP[.<subdir name under %{_javadir}>] -jarname.pom
So I guess JPP-commons-codec.pom is ok and JPP.jakarta-commons-io.pom is
a bug?
>>>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#maven_2
>>>> --
>>
>> Also, it shows:
>>
>> %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
>>
>> But org.apache.maven almost certainly needs to be changed to the appropriate
>> parent, but there is no discussion about this on the page.
>>
>
> Agreed. It should be something like:
>
> %add_to_maven_depmap <original group name for the module> %{name} %{version} JPP %{name}
Ok, that helps. Thanks.
Regards, Chris
--
java-devel mailing list
java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
