lör 2010-05-08 klockan 00:56 +0200 skrev Guido Grazioli: > Someone would disagree with me; however i think any decision is taken on > that topic would be turned in a MUST (depend or not depend) for the sake > of coherency. I can only think of rather far-fetched situations where such a dependency would be needed, so I guess I agree... > This code snippet is telling me that specifying ">= specific_version" > in BuildRequires: java-devel is optional, while it is mandatory in > Requires: java > > I have no objections to that, but the ant and maven templates below > must be updated consistently with that. Good call, fixed. > 2- JavaDoc installation > > "The name of the subdirectory SHOULD be either %{name} > or %{name}-%{version} with a symlink %{name} pointing to it." > > I would turn that in a "MUST be either " one or the other: different directory > naming should be a rare exception and SHOULD doesnt seem strong enough. Hmm, I was too lazy to look for current counterexamples which might provide guidance. Anyone have any? I changed it anyway. > You could drop the dependency on the main package for the manual too. Fixed. > I also would write a more general %add_to_maven_depmap macro call, from: > %add_to_maven_depmap org.apache.maven %{name} %{version} JPP %{name} > to: > %add_to_maven_depmap [groupId] [artifactId] %{version} > JPP[/optional_subDir] [jarName] Ok, added with a comment. > Finally, in the %files section: > %{_datadir}/maven2/poms/* > or > %{mavenpomdir}/* Ok. > Hope that helps Awesome! /Alexander -- java-devel mailing list java-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel